Home › Who I work with › Farms
Farms & agri-business
Corn and soybeans, beef, apples, hay, maple, market gardens. Farm clients I have worked with year after year, small operations and mid sized ones, across Northumberland County and the surrounding townships. Farm tax runs on its own set of rules, and knowing them is most of the job.
Nearly every other business in Canada has to report on the accrual basis, matching revenue to the period it was earned in. Farmers, along with fishers, may elect to report on a cash basis, recognizing income when it lands and expenses when they are paid.
That single difference changes how the whole year is managed. Prepaying inputs before year end, holding grain into the next calendar year, timing a cull, deciding when to take delivery of fertilizer: these become genuine tax decisions rather than just logistics. Handled well, cash basis smooths a farm's income across good years and bad ones, which matters more in farming than in almost any other business.
Handled badly, or ignored, it produces a wildly uneven tax bill with no relationship to how the farm is doing. This is the single biggest reason to have someone who works on farms rather than someone who has one farm client.
Cash basis has a catch. Because purchased inventory is deducted when paid, a farm can generate a loss simply by buying feed or livestock late in the year. The Act deals with this through inventory adjustments.
The mandatory inventory adjustment requires a cash basis farmer with a loss to add back the value of purchased inventory still on hand. The optional inventory adjustment works the other way, letting a farm bring inventory value into income deliberately, which can be a useful tool when you want income in a low year rather than the next one.
These are the mechanics behind the sentence people expect to hear, which is "your loss is not as big as your bank account says it is." Getting them right is the difference between a correct return and a reassessment.
Where part time farmers get caught. If farming is not your chief source of income, the losses you can deduct against other income are restricted, with the balance carried forward against future farm income instead. Plenty of people running cattle alongside a full time job assume the loss shelters their employment income and find out otherwise on reassessment. Whether farming is your chief source of income is a question of fact, and it is worth having the conversation before you file rather than after.
The business risk management programs are a real part of farm income and they have their own reporting.
AgriInvest is the straightforward one: you deposit, government matches within limits, and the account is there when you need it. Worth actually using, and a surprising number of eligible farms leave the matching on the table.
AgriStability is margin based, and this is the part worth understanding. It compares your program year margin against a reference margin from prior years. Because it works on margins rather than cash, the program forms require the farm's numbers restated on an accrual basis, with inventory, receivables, payables and prepaid expenses at both ends of the year, even though your tax return may be cash basis.
In other words the same farm needs two views of the same year. That is not a problem when the bookkeeping is set up to produce both. It is a scramble when it is not, and the scramble happens right at the deadline.
The program statements take the place of the ordinary statement of farming activities when you participate, and the numbers on them have to agree with the return. Reconciling those is routine work here.
Most farms sell products that are zero rated, meaning HST applies at zero percent. Grain, livestock for food, milk, most produce. Meanwhile the farm pays HST on plenty of what it buys, and claims input tax credits on it.
Zero rated sales plus taxable purchases usually means the farm is in a refund position, filing to get money back rather than to send it. Farms that are not registered, or that have drifted out of filing, are frequently leaving money behind.
The complications are at the edges, and the edges are where farms increasingly operate:
Equipment, buildings, fencing, and the farm specific items that general practitioners miss. Tile drainage has its own treatment. Quota, where a farm holds it, is an intangible with its own class and its own consequences on sale. Land improvements, bins, and on farm solar all sit in different places.
None of this is exotic, but it is specific, and the difference between the right class and a plausible looking wrong one compounds every year the schedule carries forward.
Most farm clients here are on an annual cycle with contact through the year rather than one meeting in spring. The bookkeeping is set up once so it can produce both the cash basis return and the accrual numbers the programs want, which removes the yearly scramble.
Planning conversations happen in the autumn, before year end, when prepaying inputs or holding a crop can still change the outcome. By March the year is closed and the decisions are already made, so a spring meeting is reporting rather than planning.
Fixed fee, agreed in writing. I am in Cobourg and I do come out to the farm, which is usually a faster way to understand an operation than any amount of paperwork.
Cash suits most farms, because it gives you control over timing and smooths income across seasons. Accrual can make more sense where a lender wants to see it, where the operation is large enough that matching matters, or where a farm is incorporated. It is worth deciding deliberately rather than inheriting whatever was set up years ago.
Partly, and this catches people. Where farming is not your chief source of income the deductible loss is restricted, with the remainder carried forward against future farm income. Whether farming is your chief source of income is a question of fact rather than a box you tick, and it turns on things like time spent, capital committed and how the operation is run.
It depends on the operation, but the answer is more often yes than farmers assume, particularly for anything with volatile margins. The paperwork burden is mostly a bookkeeping problem, and once the books are set up to produce accrual numbers alongside the cash ones it stops being a burden at all.
Most farms benefit from it, because zero rated sales combined with taxable inputs usually put the farm in a refund position. If you are not registered it is worth a conversation, and if you are registered but have not filed in a while there is likely money owed to you.
Less often than people are told. It can help with income splitting, deferral and eventual transfer, and it adds cost, filings and complexity. The right answer depends on your income, what you leave in the business, and what you intend for the land. It is a proper conversation rather than a rule.
Yes, and I would rather. Half an hour walking a yard tells you things a trial balance does not. Everything else runs through a secure portal for the people who would sooner not have a meeting at all.
This page describes farm tax in general terms as at August 2026 and is not advice for your operation. Thresholds, program rules and eligible regions change from year to year, so check your own situation rather than relying on a web page.
Before year end there are still decisions to make. Twenty minutes, no charge, and no obligation afterwards.
Call (905) 207-9639