Home › CPP, OAS and RRIFs
Retirement income
When to start CPP, whether to defer Old Age Security, and what to do with an RRSP at 71 are usually decided separately, months apart, by different people. They interact more than that suggests, and the interactions are where the money is.
The short version
The standard age is 65. Taking it earlier or later changes the amount permanently.
| From 60 | Reduced by 0.6% for each month before 65, so 7.2% a year. Starting at 60 means roughly 36% less, for life |
|---|---|
| At 65 | The calculated amount |
| To 70 | Increased by 0.7% for each month after 65, so 8.4% a year. Waiting until 70 means roughly 42% more, for life |
There is no advantage to waiting beyond 70. The payments are indexed, so the increase compounds against inflation rather than being eroded by it.
The arithmetic favours delaying if you live long enough. The break-even against taking it at 65 typically falls somewhere in the early to mid eighties, and against taking it at 60 rather sooner. But a break-even calculation answers only one question, and most people are asking several.
Before deciding, get the actual number. The Statement of Contributions shows your real entitlement based on your contribution history, which is frequently lower than assumed because it reflects years of low or no earnings.
The calculation drops a portion of your lowest-earning months, and further provisions can exclude time spent raising children under seven or receiving a disability pension. Those can materially change the figure and depend on the information being on file.
Old Age Security is not based on employment. It depends on years of residence in Canada after age 18, with 40 years giving a full pension and lesser periods giving a proportionate one. Ten years of residence is generally the minimum to receive it while living in Canada.
Living outside Canada is a different test. Payments can generally continue abroad only where you accumulated at least 20 years of residence after 18; below that, payments stop after a period of absence. This matters to anyone considering a long stay elsewhere, and to people who spent much of their working life in another country. See snowbirds and US tax.
Service Canada enrols many people automatically and sends a letter the month after the 64th birthday. If you received that letter, there is nothing to do but check it.
If no letter arrived, you must apply. This is where people lose money, because nothing prompts you and the payments simply never start. Time spent abroad, gaps in the records or a recent move are common reasons for not being enrolled automatically.
Three ways to apply:
Apply about six months before you want payments to begin.
The eleven month limit. If you discover years later that you were never receiving OAS, the maximum backdating is eleven months plus the month you apply. Anything earlier is not recoverable.
If you are past 65 and unsure whether you are receiving it, that is worth checking this week rather than at some point. Every month of delay is a month permanently lost.
OAS can be deferred to 70, increasing by 0.6% a month, up to about 36% more. The reasoning resembles CPP.
With one important exception. The Guaranteed Income Supplement, for those with low income, is not increased by deferring, and it cannot be received during the deferral. For someone who would qualify for GIS, deferring OAS is usually a clear mistake, and it is advice that gets applied generally when it should not be.
Above an income threshold, OAS is clawed back at 15 cents on the dollar, and above an upper threshold it disappears entirely. It is based on net world income and is recovered by reducing payments in the following July to June period, so a single high-income year affects the next year's cash flow.
Because the clawback works on total income, most of the planning is about the shape of income rather than its amount: pension splitting, the timing of RRIF withdrawals, when to realize capital gains, and whether to draw from registered or non-registered accounts in a given year.
The most useful lever is the TFSA. Money taken out of a TFSA is not income. It does not appear on the return, does not count toward the recovery tax, and does not reduce the age amount.
So a retiree who needs an extra $15,000 in a year has two very different options. Taking it from a RRIF adds $15,000 of income, which may claw back Old Age Security and erode credits on top of the tax. Taking it from a TFSA does none of that.
This is the argument for continuing to contribute to a TFSA in retirement rather than treating it as a savings vehicle for younger people. Contribution room keeps accruing every year regardless of income, and withdrawals restore the room in the following year.
The age amount works the same way, reducing as income rises and disappearing above a threshold, so income shape affects it too. Two credits and one benefit all moving with the same number is why the timing of a large withdrawal deserves more thought than it usually gets.
An RRSP cannot continue indefinitely. By 31 December of the year you turn 71, it must be dealt with, and there are three options.
| Withdraw it | The entire amount becomes income in that year. Almost never sensible for a meaningful balance |
|---|---|
| Convert to a RRIF | The usual choice. The investments continue; a minimum must be withdrawn each year |
| Buy an annuity | Exchange the balance for a guaranteed income stream |
These are not exclusive. Converting part to a RRIF and annuitizing part is common and is often better than either alone.
Withdrawals must begin the year after the RRIF is established, and the minimum is a percentage of the balance at the start of each year, set by your age. It begins in the region of 5% at 71 and rises steadily with age, reaching 20% in the mid-nineties.
Two features worth knowing before setting one up:
Nothing requires waiting until 71. Converting a small portion of an RRSP to a RRIF at 65 creates eligible pension income, which does two things: it qualifies for the pension income amount, a modest annual credit that is otherwise unused, and it becomes eligible for splitting with a spouse.
For a couple where one has most of the registered savings, starting that at 65 rather than 71 can be worth doing for six years running.
This is the part that surprises families. A RRIF passing to a spouse or common-law partner can generally roll over without immediate tax. Passing to anyone else, the entire remaining value is brought into income on the final return, frequently producing the largest tax bill of the person's life.
A $400,000 RRIF can leave a six-figure liability against an estate whose other assets are a house and a chequing account. Knowing that in advance changes decisions about withdrawal pace, insurance and what the estate will need in cash. See estates and final returns.
Most people now have one, and it behaves differently from everything else on this page in a way that makes it the most useful account to hold in later life.
Re-contributing too early. A withdrawal restores contribution room, but not until 1 January of the following year. Putting the money back in the same calendar year, without separate unused room, is an over-contribution and attracts a penalty of 1% per month on the excess for as long as it remains. This is the single most common TFSA error and it catches people who were being careful.
Naming a beneficiary instead of a successor holder. These sound similar and are not.
| Successor holder | Available to a spouse or common-law partner only. The TFSA simply becomes theirs, intact, continuing to grow tax-free. No contribution room of theirs is used |
|---|---|
| Beneficiary | The value at the date of death passes tax-free, but any growth after that date is taxable, and the account does not continue as a TFSA |
For a married couple the successor holder designation is almost always the better choice, and the form is usually completed once at the institution and never revisited. It is worth checking what yours actually says.
For anyone whose income is low enough to receive the Guaranteed Income Supplement, the difference between a TFSA and an RRSP is stark. A RRIF withdrawal is income and reduces GIS, sometimes at a very high effective rate once the clawback is added to the tax. A TFSA withdrawal does neither.
That reverses the usual advice. For a modest-income earner, contributing to a TFSA rather than an RRSP is frequently the better long-run decision, precisely because of what happens after 65 rather than what happens at the moment of contribution.
An annuity converts a lump sum into a guaranteed income. It removes investment risk and longevity risk, and it removes flexibility, which is the whole trade.
Purchased with registered funds, the payments are fully taxable as received, which keeps the tax treatment simple.
This is a product decision rather than a tax one. Which annuity, from which insurer, on what terms, requires a licensed advisor. What I can do is tell you what a given income stream does to your tax position and your OAS.
On working with your investment advisor. Your RRIF sits with an institution, and an advisor almost always administers it. That is as it should be, and the split of responsibility is worth being explicit about.
They handle what the money is invested in, how the plan is set up, and what gets paid out. I handle what those payments do to your tax bill, your OAS and your spouse's return.
The failure mode is not either of us doing our job badly. It is the two decisions being made separately: a withdrawal schedule arranged without knowing what other income the year holds, and an accountant seeing it the following April when the year is closed. If you are setting up a RRIF or changing withdrawals, a short conversation involving both of us beforehand is worth considerably more than either of us alone afterwards.
Up to half of eligible pension income can be reported on a spouse's return instead of your own. Where one person holds most of the retirement income, this can move a substantial amount into a lower bracket.
What qualifies depends on age, which is the part that catches people:
| Before 65 | Essentially only income from a registered pension plan, the traditional company pension |
|---|---|
| From 65 | Also RRIF withdrawals and annuity payments from registered savings |
CPP and OAS do not qualify. CPP has its own separate mechanism, pension sharing, arranged through Service Canada rather than on the return, requiring an application and both spouses to be at least 60.
Three things about splitting worth knowing. It is an annual election made on both returns, so it is not set once and forgotten. Beyond the bracket saving, it can create eligible pension income for the receiving spouse and unlock a credit they otherwise could not use. And it can reduce or eliminate the OAS recovery tax by moving income out of the clawback range, which is frequently worth more than the bracket difference itself.
There is no single answer. Taking it at 60 means roughly 36% less for life; waiting until 70 means roughly 42% more. Delaying wins if you live into your eighties, and the relevant considerations are your health and family history, whether you need the income now, what other income you have that year, whether you are still working, and your spouse's position. A larger indexed payment also functions as insurance against outliving your savings, which has value beyond the expected total.
Apply immediately. Not everyone is enrolled automatically, and where no application is made the payments simply never begin. Backdating is limited to eleven months plus the month of application, so every month of delay is permanently lost. You can apply online through My Service Canada Account, by paper, or in person at a Service Canada centre, which is the better route if your residence history is complicated.
Because there is no withholding tax on the minimum required RRIF withdrawal. Amounts above the minimum have tax withheld, the minimum does not, so the money arrives in full and the tax on it comes due at filing. Withholding can be requested voluntarily, or instalments arranged, to avoid the surprise.
It depends heavily on income. The increase is about 36% for waiting to 70, which suits someone with other income and reasonable health expectations. But the Guaranteed Income Supplement is not increased by deferring and cannot be received during it, so for anyone likely to qualify for GIS, deferring is usually a mistake. General advice to defer is often given without that distinction.
Not through pension income splitting, which excludes CPP and OAS. CPP has a separate mechanism called pension sharing, applied for through Service Canada rather than claimed on a return, available where both spouses are at least 60. It works differently and has to be arranged rather than elected at tax time.
This page describes general principles as at August 2026 and is not advice for your situation. Rates, thresholds and the amounts of benefits change regularly, several of the provisions above have conditions beyond what is set out here, and the choice of investments or annuity products requires a licensed advisor rather than an accountant.
That is the window where these decisions are still open. Twenty minutes, no charge.
Call (905) 207-9639